Top latest Five cases laws on sukuk bonds Urban news
Top latest Five cases laws on sukuk bonds Urban news
Blog Article
The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
refers to law that arrives from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case law, also known as “common law,” and “case precedent,” supplies a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And the way They're applied in certain types of case.
four. Record shows that the petitioner has long been booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Though the petitioner has obtained bail in Individuals cases, it does, prima facie, establish that the petitioner is prone to repeating the offence.
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced for the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed by the respondent/Institute, these rules might not have the operates within a clear legal and regulatory framework from the respondent/Institute. fourteen. In view of what has become discussed previously mentioned, without touching the merits of the case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the petition is sustained along with the petition is held to be not maintainable in terms of Article 199 of your Constitution for that reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus in terms of ratio on the judgment passed from the Supreme Court during the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. Read more
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Provided the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been from the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally seem, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be issue to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case in the petitioners for promotion can be deemed, however, we're apparent in our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, subject to availability of vacancy matter for the approval of your competent authority. Read more
The issue Here's that an accused may well say that they intended to injure the sufferer, but they did not intend to get rid of them. In other words, they may claim that thedeath that resulted because of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor supposed.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, which include eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of your seized currency.
I) The above referred case FIR, to the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered about the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who's father with the petitioner and as per story of FIR, the petitioner is surely an eyewkness from the incidence.
The DCFS social worker in charge of the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-thirty day period report for the court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
this Court is left with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion with the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
However, it’s essential to note that the application of your death penalty is subject matter to several legal safeguards and owing process to ensure fair trials.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were instructed in the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Protected with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they had very more info little to fret about.